+91-9929435130 editor@ijset.in

Author’s Guidelines

Conference Proceeding

International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology will Publish all the Conference Proceeding in separate Sub domains of Conference.

Currently, two Conferences are in Progress,

1. Recent Advances in Technology and Engineering- 2017 (Department of CSE, T John Institute of Technology, Bangalore)

2. National Conference on Communication and Image Processing- 2017 (Department of ECE, T John Institute of Technology, Bangalore)

kindly Download Manuscript Template by click below button-

Manuscript Template

General Information

Prepare a Cover letter which explains why you think your Paper falls within the Scope of the Journal and which outline’s the Paper’s originality significance.

Integraity

Never Submit your paper more than one Journal at the same time, that would be violating Publishing Integrity.

Peer- Review Process

Every author’s draft is undergone a Double blind review process at IJSET Journal. The process, as we are aware of, involves a closed review of the manuscript by two peers, concealing the identities of the author and the reviewers. The sole reason for blind review is to avoid any conscious or sub conscious bias. We strive for a quick review and with that, the complete circle of one paper’s peer review takes about 4 days. The sequence goes as follows:

Preliminary Submission

  • Author submits the research paper
  • manuscript through Online Submission Form

Initial Screening of the paper

After the receipt of the paper, it is forwarded to the sub editor of the respective journal, who first reviews the submission   to ensure it fits with the scope of the journal.

Another essential element that is checked upon in the initial screening is the presence of plagiarism. IJSET adopts zero-plagiarism policy and if encountered, the paper is suggested a revision or rejection, depending on the plagiarism count.

Blind Review by Peers

The paper from the sub editor is forwarded to two peers for a critical analysis. The referees generally evaluate the paper on the following aspects:

  • To judge the relevance of literature studied
  • To study the Methodology defined and adopted
  • To check on the integrity of the scientific work
  • To evaluate the study’s findings and their significance to the academia
  • To ensure the accuracy of References

Paper evaluation by referees consumes approximately 4 days, henceforth the assessment scores, with the review comments are forwarded to the Chief Editor of the respective journal for a final valuation.

Final Assessment by Chief Editor

The Chief Editor reviews the comments and assessment scores, shared by the referees. Basis a quality check for Grammar, Language, Layout & Format, Style and Graphic Quality of Illustrations and the peers’score, the Chief Editor gives his final judgment of whether or not to accept the manuscript for publication.

Chief Editor takes the decision to Reject, Accept with Changes or Accept as it is.

Download for Authors

Manuscript Template

Download

Copyright Form

Download